Conceptualizing Marital Intimacy Based on Quranic Verses and Hadiths

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 rihu.ac.ir

2 Head of the Psychometric Intelligence Quotient Research Center, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Extended Abstract
 
Introduction and Objectives: Marital intimacy is one of the most fundamental components of the quality of spousal relationships and one of the most important predictors of family satisfaction, stability, and health. Psychological research has demonstrated that this construct is closely associated with various dimensions of marital functioning, including communication quality, adjustment, mental health, and marital stability. Despite the proliferation of studies in this field, there remains no theoretical consensus regarding the nature, definition, and dimensions of marital intimacy. In the psychological literature, intimacy has been conceptualized variously as an emotional experience, an interactive characteristic, or, from certain perspectives, a basic human need. Moreover, the proposed models for the dimensions of intimacy differ substantially from one another and have suggested divergent components for it—a situation that has led to ambiguity in the operational definition, measurement, and explanation of this construct.
A review of domestic studies also indicates that the majority of research has focused on factors affecting intimacy, educational and enhancement interventions, or the development of measurement tools based on conventional psychological frameworks. Although efforts have been made in recent years to utilize Islamic texts in explaining marital intimacy, the conceptualization of this construct based on the epistemological foundations of Islam still faces theoretical ambiguities, particularly in determining its conceptual equivalent, distinguishing it from related notions such as affection (maḥabbat), mawaddah, uns, and ulfah, and clarifying the structure of its dimensions.
Accordingly, the aim of the present study is to conceptualize marital intimacy based on the verses of the Holy Qur’an and the narrations of the Infallibles (peace be upon them), to identify the semantic core and the precise equivalent of this concept in Islamic sources, and to explain its dimensions and components within a coherent conceptual model—a model that can provide a theoretical foundation for developing family psychology research, designing indigenous assessment tools, and formulating educational and counseling interventions grounded in Islamic teachings.
Method: The present study, conducted with the aim of conceptualizing marital intimacy within the framework of Islamic teachings, employed the method of qualitative content analysis of religious texts. Data were collected through a systematic review of lexical sources, verses of the Holy Qur’an, authentic narrations (aḥādīth), interpretive sources (tafāsīr), and the scientific literature related to marital intimacy. The analysis process was carried out in five consecutive stages.
In the first stage, through systematic observation, the scope of the study was delineated, and equivalents, cognate terms, and relevant evidence concerning the concept of intimacy in Islamic and psychological sources were identified and collected. In the second stage, the selected sources were read repeatedly and in depth so that the lexical and conceptual usages of the terms in different contexts—with attention to the context of the verses, narrations, lexical analyses, and exegetical views—could be clarified. In the third stage, the extracted concepts were classified and organized on the basis of semantic similarities, internal relations, and levels of abstraction, without imposing a predetermined theoretical framework, and the main categories were formed.
In the fourth stage, the validity of the findings was evaluated using the cumulative qualitative method (QIC-KV), based on the principle of “cumulative conjecture” (tarākum al-ẓunūn). In this stage, the findings were assessed according to two criteria: (1) soundness (matīn būdan), including traceability to sources and internal coherence, and (2) usefulness (mufīd būdan), including psychological explanatory power and theoretical applicability; only concepts with sufficient support were retained in the final analysis. In the final stage, the validated concepts were integrated, their relationships were explained, and ultimately the conceptual model of marital intimacy was formulated and reported by determining its semantic core and main dimensions within the semantic system of Islam.
Results: The findings of the study showed that one of the major challenges in the literature on marital intimacy is the confusion of this concept with notions such as affection (maḥabbat), mawaddah, uns, ulfah, and love (ʿishq). A comparative examination of lexical sources and Islamic texts revealed that the closest equivalent of the word intimacy in Arabic is ḥamīmiyyah, derived from the triliteral root ḥ-m-m. The analysis of authoritative dictionaries, the verses of the Holy Qur’an, and the narrations indicated that, despite the diverse usages of this root in different meanings, the shared semantic core of all of them is “closeness, nearness, and deep connection” (qurb). This closeness appears in human relationships as emotional proximity, kinship, and existential connection, and in other usages as approaching the utmost intensity or effect. Accordingly, “closeness” (qurb) was identified as the organizing core of the concept of marital intimacy within the framework of Islamic thought.
Based on this semantic core, the systematic analysis of verses and narrations related to spousal relations showed that marital intimacy in Islam is a multidimensional construct manifested in seven interrelated dimensions: physical, emotional, cognitive, communicative, sexual, participatory, and spiritual intimacy. Each of these dimensions is supported by Qur’anic and narrational evidence and includes indicators such as peaceful cohabitation (sukūn), affection and mercy (mawaddah wa raḥmah), mutual knowledge and consultation (shūrā), living together in kindness (muʿāsharah bi al-maʿrūf) and dialogue, lawful sexual relations accompanied by dignity and divine intention, cooperation and shared responsibility in married life, and companionship in the path of spiritual growth.
Validation of the findings using the cumulative qualitative method (QIC-KV) and expert evaluation also showed that the extracted seven-dimensional structure possessed desirable conceptual coherence, religious traceability, and psychological explanatory capacity. After incorporating the suggested revisions, it was finalized as the conceptual model of marital intimacy.
Discussion and Conclusion: The findings of this research demonstrated that the concept of marital intimacy in Islamic sources cannot be equated merely with concepts such as affection (maḥabbat), mawaddah, uns, or love (ʿishq); rather, its closest conceptual equivalent is ḥamīmiyyah, which, based on analysis of the root ḥ-m-m, is grounded in the meaning of “closeness and nearness.” This finding provides a new basis for redefining marital intimacy within the framework of Islamic thought and shows that intimacy, before being a set of emotions or behaviors, is a kind of “existential closeness” (qurb-e vojūdī) between husband and wife that manifests in different domains of married life. From this perspective, the physical, emotional, cognitive, communicative, sexual, participatory, and spiritual dimensions are not independent and scattered components, but rather interwoven layers of a single reality centered on closeness.
This formulation differs fundamentally from common psychological models, because whereas many theories explain intimacy mainly at the level of emotional experience, psychological need, or interpersonal interactions, the present model, by relying on the semantic and anthropological foundations of Islam, offers a conceptual and normative framework for understanding intimacy. Accordingly, desirable closeness in marital life is not limited to the intensity of emotional attachment, but is linked to moral growth, responsibility, tranquility (sakīnah), affection (mawaddah), mercy (raḥmah), and spiritual elevation.
Overall, the proposed seven-dimensional model, supported by lexical, Qur’anic, and narrational foundations, can provide an indigenous and coherent basis for developing family psychology theories within the Islamic framework. It also has considerable potential for designing indigenous intimacy assessment tools, developing educational and counseling programs, and conducting empirical studies to examine the relationships among the various dimensions of marital intimacy and their consequences for family quality of life.

Keywords

References

منابع
* قرآن کریم.
ابن‌بابویه، محمد (1406ق)، ثواب الاعمال و عقاب الاعمال، قم: دارالشریف للنشر.
ابن‌سیده، علی بن اسماعیل (بی‌تا)، المخصص، بیروت: دار إحیاء التراث العربی.
ابن‌کثیر، اسماعیل (1419ق)، تفسیر القرآن العظیم، بیروت: دارالکتب العلمیه.
ابن‌منظور، محمد بن مکرم (1414ق)، لسان العرب، بیروت: دار صادر.
ابوحبیب، سعدی (1408ق)، القاموس الفقهی لغةً و اصطلاحاً، دمشق: دارالفکر.
أزدی صُحاری، عبدالله بن محمد (1996م)، کتاب الماء، مسقط: وزارة التراث القومی و الثقافة.
اولیا، نرگس (1385)، بررسی تأثیر آموزش غنی‌سازی زندگی زناشویی بر افزایش رضایتمندی زوجین شهر اصفهان، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه اصفهان.
برزگر، اسماعیل؛ سامانی، سیامک (1395)، «نقش واسطه‌ای صمیمیت در رابطه بین الگوهای ارتباطی و کیفیت زندگی زناشویی»، فصلنامه زن و جامعه، ش2، ص115–127.
ثناگویی‌زاده، محمد (1400الف)، «الگوی غنی‌سازی صمیمیت زناشویی در دیدگاه اسلامی» (یک پژوهش کیفی)، فصلنامه فرهنگ مشاوره، ش45، ص1–28.
ثناگویی‌زاده، محمد (1400ب)، «تدوین برنامه اسلامی غنی‌سازی صمیمیت زناشویی و اثربخشی آن بر صمیمیت و رضایت زناشویی»، پژوهش‌نامه اسلامی زنان و خانواده، ش23، ص9–34.
ثناگویی‌زاده، محمد (1400ج)، «الگوی خودمراقبتی منظم در صمیمیت زناشویی برخاسته از دیدگاه اسلامی»، روان‌شناسی فرهنگی، س5، ش1، ص166–194.
حسینی زبیدی، محمد مرتضی (بی‌تا)، تاج العروس من جواهر القاموس، کویت: وزارة الإرشاد و الأنباء.
حسینیان، سیمین؛ یزدی، منور؛ طباطبایی، ملیحه (1390)، «اثربخشی آموزش مهارت‌های ارتباطی بر صمیمیت زناشویی زنان متأهل»، فصلنامه فرهنگی ـ تربیتی زنان و خانواده، ش6، ص45–70.
خجسته‌مهر، رضا؛ موحدی، معصومه؛ رجبی، غلامرضا (1389)، «تأثیر آموزش صمیمیت بر افزایش صمیمیت ارتباطی زوجین»، مجله دستاوردهای روان‌شناختی (علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی)، ش1، ص53–68.
رضایی، جواد؛ احمدی، سید احمد؛ اعتمادی، عذرا؛ فاتحی‌زاده، مریم‌السادات؛ رضایی حسین‌آبادی، مریم؛ شهدوست، مریم (1390)، «تأثیر آموزش سبک زندگی اسلام‌محور با تأکید بر نظام خانواده بر صمیمیت زوجین اراک»، مطالعات روان‌شناختی، ش9، ص76–106.
زمخشری، محمود بن عمر (1999م)، مقدمة الأدب، بیروت: دار البشائر الإسلامیة.
زید بن علی (بی‌تا)، مسند زید بن علی، بیروت: منشورات دارالمکتبة الحیاة.
سلطانعلی شاه، محمد (1372)، تفسیر بیان السعاده فی مقامات العباده، تهران: انتشارات سر الاسرار.
شجاعی، محمدصادق (1399)، «روش تحلیل کیفی محتوای متون دینی»، مطالعات اسلام و روان‌شناسی، ش27، ص41–73.
شجاعی، محمدصادق؛ شجاعی، محمدمهدی (1404)، «مدل مفهومی تاب‌آوری معنوی براساس دعای هفتم صحیفه سجادیه»، مطالعات اسلام و روان‌شناسی، ش38، ص71–104.
شحاته، محمود (1423ق)، تفسیر مقاتل، بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی.
صاحب بن عباد، اسماعیل (1414ق)، المحیط فی اللغة، تحقیق محمدحسن آل‌یاسین، بیروت: عالم الکتب.
طباطبایی، محمدحسین (1417ق)، المیزان فی تفسیر القرآن، قم: دفتر انتشارات اسلامی.
طبرسی، فضل بن حسن (1380)، تفسیر مجمع البیان، ترجمه علی کرمی، تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی.
طبری، محمد بن جریر (1412ق)، جامع البیان فی تفسیر القرآن، بیروت: دارالمعرفه.
طوسی، محمد بن حسن (بی‌تا)، التبیان فی تفسیر القرآن، بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی.
اعتمادی، عذرا (1384)، بررسی و مقایسه اثربخشی رویکرد روانی آموزشی مبتنی بر شناختی ـ رفتاری و ارتباط‌درمانی بر صمیمیت زوج‌ها، پایان‌نامه دکتری، دانشگاه تربیت معلم تهران.
فیروزآبادی، محمد بن یعقوب (1980م)، القاموس المحیط، بیروت: مؤسسة الرسالة.
نظری، علی‌محمد؛ اسدی، مسعود؛ شاهینی، علی (1388)، «تأثیر خانواده‌درمانی کوتاه‌مدت ستیر بر صمیمیت زوج‌ها»، زن و مطالعات خانواده، ش5، ص109–129.
 
References
Abū Ḥabīb, Sa'dī (1408 AH). Al-Qāmūs al-Fiqhī Lughatan wa Iṣṭilāḥan. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr. [In Arabic]
Aldous, J. (1977). "Family Interaction Patterns." Annual Review of Sociology, 3(1), 105-135.
Azdī Ṣuḥārī, 'Abdullāh ibn Muḥammad (1996). Kitāb al-Mā'. Muscat: Wizārat al-Turāth al-Qawmī wa al-Thaqāfah. [In Arabic]
Barzegar, E., & Sāmānī, S. (2016/1395). "Naqsh-e Mīānjīgarī-ye Ṣamīmīyat dar Rābeṭeh beyn-e Olgūhā-ye Ertebāṭī va Keyfīyat-e Zendegī-ye Zanāshū'ī" [The Mediating Role of Intimacy in the Relationship between Communication Patterns and Marital Quality of Life]. Faṣlnāmeh-ye Zan va Jāme'eh, 7(2), 115-127. [In Persian]
Cordova, J. V., & Scott, R. L. (2001). "Intimacy: A Behavioral Interpretation." The Behavior Analyst, 24(1), 75-86.
Dakowicz, A., & Dakowicz, L. (2021). "The Quality of Marital Communication of Spouses with a Higher and Lower Level of Satisfaction with Their Relationship." Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio, 46(2), 129-141.
Derlega, V. J. (Ed.). (2013). Communication, Intimacy, and Close Relationships. Elsevier.
E‘temādī, 'Ozrā (2005/1384). Barrasī va Moqāyeseh-ye Asarbakhshī-ye Rūykard-e Ravān-Āmūzī-ye Mobtanī bar Shenākhtī-Raftārī va Ertebāṭ-Darmānī bar Ṣamīmīyat-e Zavjhā [A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral and Communication Therapy Approaches on Couples' Intimacy] (Doctoral dissertation). Tarbiat Moallem University, Tehran. [In Persian]
Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). "The Suffocation of Marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without Enough Oxygen." Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 1-41.
Fīrūzābādī, Muḥammad ibn Ya'qūb (1980). Al-Qāmūs al-Muḥīṭ. Beirut: Mu'assisat al-Risālah. [In Arabic]
Greeff, A. P., & Malherbe, H. L. (2001). "Intimacy and Marital Satisfaction in Spouses." Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 27(3), 247-257.
Ḥoseynīān, S., Yazdī, M., & Ṭabāṭabā'ī, M. (2011/1390). "Asarbakhshī-ye Āmūzesh-e Mahārathā-ye Ertebāṭī bar Ṣamīmīyat-e Zanāshū'ī-ye Zanān-e Motā'ahhel" [Effectiveness of Communication Skills Training on Marital Intimacy of Married Women]. Faṣlnāmeh-ye Farhangī-Tarbīyatī-ye Zanān va Khānevādeh, 6, 45-70. [In Persian]
Ḥusaynī Zubaydī, Muḥammad Murtaḍā (n.d.). Tāj al-'Arūs min Jawāhir al-Qāmūs. Kuwait: Wizārat al-Irshād wa al-Anbā'. [In Arabic]
Ibn Bābawayh, Muḥammad (1406 AH). Thawāb al-A'māl wa 'Iqāb al-A'māl. Qom: Dār al-Sharīf lil-Nashr. [In Arabic]
Ibn Kathīr, Ismā'īl (1419 AH). Tafsīr al-Qur'ān al-'Aẓīm. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah. [In Arabic]
Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad ibn Mukarram (1414 AH). Lisān al-'Arab. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sīdah, 'Alī ibn Ismā'īl (n.d.). Al-Mukhaṣṣaṣ. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā' al-Turāth al-'Arabī. [In Arabic]
Jamieson, L. (1999). "Intimacy Transformed? A Critical Look at the 'Pure Relationship'." Sociology, 33(3), 477-494.
Kardan, S. M., Khani, S., Hamzehgardeshi, Z., & Mohammadpour, R. A. (2018). "Socio demographic Factors Predicting Marital Intimacy in a Sample of Iranian Couples: A Cross sectional Study." Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 7(6), 1433-1439.
Keltner, S. K., & Kelly, O. (2009). "What Is Intimacy?" In Psychoanalysis, Aesthetics, and Politics in the Work of Julia Kristeva (pp. 163-177).
Khojasṭeh-Mehr, R., Movahhedī, M., & Rajabī, Gh. (2010/1389). "Ta'thīr-e Āmūzesh-e Ṣamīmīyat bar Afzāyesh-e Ṣamīmīyat-e Ertebāṭī-ye Zavjīn" [The Effect of Intimacy Training on Increasing Couples' Communicational Intimacy]. Majalleh-ye Dastāvardhā-ye Ravān-shenākhtī ('Olūm-e Tarbīyatī va Ravān-shenāsī), 1, 53-68. [In Persian]
Kim, M. (2013). "The Effect of Marital Intimacy, Sex Communication, and Sexual Satisfaction on Marital Satisfaction among Korean Middle aged Women." Journal of Next Generation Information Technology, 4(8), 441-448.
Langer, S. L., Romano, J. M., Todd, M., Strauman, T. J., Keefe, F. J., Syrjala, K. L., & Porter, L. S. (2018). "Links between Communication and Relationship Satisfaction among Patients with Cancer and Their Spouses: Results of a Fourteen Day Smartphone Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Study." Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1843.
Lee, H., & Yoon, H. G. (2023). "Body Change Stress, Sexual Function, and Marital Intimacy in Korean Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Cross sectional Study." Asia Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing, 10(5), 100228.
Miller, R. S., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1982). "The Assessment of Social Intimacy." Journal of Personality Assessment, 46(5), 514-518.
Moss, B. F., & Schwebel, A. I. (1993). "Defining Intimacy in Romantic Relationships." Family Relations, 42, 31-37.
Naẓarī, 'A. M., Asadī, M., & Shāhīnī, A. (2009/1388). "Ta'thīr-e Khānevādeh-Darmānī-ye Kūtāh-Moddat-e Satīr bar Ṣamīmīyat-e Zavjhā" [The Effect of Short-Term Satir Family Therapy on Couples' Intimacy]. Zan va Moṭāle'āt-e Khānevādeh, 5, 109-129. [In Persian]
Nurhayati, S. R., Faturochman, F., & Helmi, A. F. (2019). "Marital Quality: A Conceptual Review." Buletin Psikologi, 27(2), 109-124.
O'Brien, M., & Peyton, V. (2002). "Parenting Attitudes and Marital Intimacy: A Longitudinal Analysis." Journal of Family Psychology, 16(2), 118-133.
Olīā, N. (2006/1385). Barrasī-ye Ta'thīr-e Āmūzesh-e Ghani-sāzī-ye Zendegī-ye Zanāshū'ī bar Afzāyesh-e Rezāyatmandī-ye Zavjīn dar Shahr-e Eṣfahān [The Effect of Marital Life Enrichment Training on Increasing Couples' Satisfaction in Isfahan] (Master's thesis). University of Isfahan. [In Persian]
Oxford English–Arabic Dictionary. (2014). Oxford University Press.
Pasha, H., Basirat, Z., Esmailzadeh, S., Faramarzi, M., & Adibrad, H. (2017). "Marital Intimacy and Predictive Factors among Infertile Women in Northern Iran." Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(5), QC13-QC16.
Rabin, C. (1998). "Gender and Intimacy in the Treatment of Couples in the 1990s." Sexual and Marital Therapy, 13(2), 179-190.
Reẓā'ī, J., Aḥmadī, S. A., Etemādī, 'O., Fāteḥīzādeh, M. S., Reẓā'ī Ḥoseynābādī, M., & Shahdūst, M. (2011/1390). "Ta'thīr-e Āmūzesh-e Sabk-e Zendegī-ye Eslām-Meḥvar bā Ta'kīd bar Neẓām-e Khānevādeh bar Ṣamīmīyat-e Zavjīn-e Arāk" [The Effect of Islam-Oriented Lifestyle Training with Emphasis on Family System on Couples' Intimacy in Arak]. Moṭāle'āt-e Ravān-shenākhtī, 9, 76-106. [In Persian]
Ṣāḥib ibn 'Ibād, Ismā'īl (1414 AH). Al-Muḥīṭ fī al-Lughah (Ed. Muḥammad Ḥasan Āl Yāsīn). Beirut: 'Ālam al-Kutub. [In Arabic]
Sanāgū'īzādeh, M. (2021a/1400a). "Olgū-ye Ghanī-sāzī-ye Ṣamīmīyat-e Zanāshū'ī dar Dīdgāh-e Eslāmī: Yek Pažūhesh-e Keyfī" [The Model of Marital Intimacy Enrichment in Islamic Perspective: A Qualitative Research]. Faṣlnāmeh-ye Farhang-e Mashāvereh, 45, 1-28. [In Persian]
Sanāgū'īzādeh, M. (2021b/1400b). "Tadvīn-e Barnāmeh-ye Eslāmī-ye Ghanī-sāzī-ye Ṣamīmīyat-e Zanāshū'ī va Asarbakhshī-ye Ān bar Ṣamīmīyat va Rezāyatmandī-ye Zanāshū'ī" [Developing an Islamic Program for Marital Intimacy Enrichment and Its Effectiveness on Marital Intimacy and Satisfaction]. Pazhouhesh-nāmeh-ye Eslāmī-ye Zanān va Khānevādeh, 23, 9-34. [In Persian]
Sanāgū'īzādeh, M. (2021c/1400c). "Olgū-ye Khod-Morāqebatī-ye Manẓam dar Ṣamīmīyat-e Zanāshū'ī Bar-khāsteh az Dīdgāh-e Eslāmī" [The Model of Regular Self-Care in Marital Intimacy Derived from Islamic Perspective]. Do-Faṣlnāmeh-ye Ravān-shenāsī-ye Farhangī, 5(1), 166-194. [In Persian]
Schaefer, M. T., & Olson, D. H. (1981). "Assessing Intimacy: The PAIR Inventory." Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7(1), 47-60.
Shāḥātah, Maḥmūd (1423 AH). Tafsīr Muqātil. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā' al-Turāth al-'Arabī. [In Arabic]
Shojā'ī, M. S. (2020/1399). "Ravesh-e Taḥlīl-e Keyfī-ye Moḥtavā-ye Motūn-e Dīnī" [Qualitative Content Analysis Method of Religious Texts]. Faṣlnāmeh-ye Moṭāle'āt-e Eslām va Ravān-shenāsī, 27, 41-73. [In Persian]
Shojā'ī, M. S., & Shojā'ī, M. M. (2025/1404). "Model-e Mafhūmī-ye Tābāvarī-ye Ma'navī bar Asās-e Do'ā-ye Haftom-e Ṣaḥīfeh-ye Sajjādīyeh" [Conceptual Model of Spiritual Resilience Based on the Seventh Supplication of Sahifa al-Sajjadiyya]. Moṭāle'āt-e Eslām va Ravān-shenāsī, 38, 71-104. [In Persian]
Spurlock, J. C. (2005). "Modern Love: Romance, Intimacy, and the Marriage Crisis." Journal of Social History, 39(1), 287-288.
Stadler, G., Snyder, K. A., Horn, A. B., Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2012). "Close Relationships and Health in Daily Life: A Review and Empirical Data on Intimacy and Somatic Symptoms." Psychosomatic Medicine, 74(4), 398-409.
Sulṭān-'Alīshāh, Muḥammad (1372). Tafsīr Bayān al-Sa'āda fī Maqāmāt al-'Ibāda. Tehran: Enteshārāt-e Serr al-Asrār. [In Arabic]
Ṭabarī, Muḥammad ibn Jarīr (1412 AH). Jāmi' al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qur'ān. Beirut: Dār al-Ma'rifah. [In Arabic]
Ṭabarsī, Faḍl ibn Ḥasan (1380/2001). Tafsīr-e Majma' al-Bayān (Trans. 'Alī Karamī). Tehran: Vizārat-e Farhang va Irshād-e Eslāmī. [In Arabic]
Ṭabāṭabā'ī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn (1417 AH). Al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qur'ān. Qom: Daftar-e Enteshārāt-e Eslāmī. [In Arabic]
Ṭūsī, Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan (n.d.). Al-Tibyān fī Tafsīr al-Qur'ān. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā' al-Turāth al-'Arabī.
Vanden Broucke, S., Vandereycken, W., & Vertommen, H. (1995). "Marital Intimacy: Conceptualization and Assessment." Clinical Psychology Review, 15(3), 217-233.
Waring, E. M., & Reddon, J. R. (1983). "The Measurement of Intimacy in Marriage: The Waring Intimacy Questionnaire." Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(1), 53-57.
Yoo, J. (2022). "Gender Role Attitude, Communication Quality, and Marital Satisfaction among Korean Adults." Journal of Family Studies, 28(3), 1108-1125.
Zamakhsharī, Maḥmūd ibn 'Umar (1999). Muqaddimat al-Adab. Beirut: Dār al-Bashā'ir al-Islāmiyyah. [In Arabic]
Zayd ibn 'Alī (n.d.). Musnad Zayd ibn 'Alī. Beirut: Manshūrāt Dār al-Maktabah al-Ḥayāh. [In Arabic]

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics