The Architecture of Wise Interaction Between Spouses: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Underlying Factors from the Perspective of the Holy Qur’an with Emphasis on Tafsir al-Mizan

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Senior Family Consultant, Abdolazim Hassani Institute of Higher and Specialized Education, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Extended Abstract
 
Introduction and Objectives: The family, as a foundational institution, plays a central role in providing tranquility and supporting human development. The quality of spousal interactions constitutes a decisive factor in the stability of this institution. Wise interaction represents an elevated level of relational engagement, one that transcends emotional reactivity and is grounded in conscious decision-making and rational deliberation.
Although psychological studies have conceptualized wisdom as an individual trait associated with outcomes such as resilience and life satisfaction, and domestic religious research has explored its conceptual dimensions within primary Islamic sources, there remains a notable research gap in two areas:
(1) The lack of theorization regarding relational and interactional patterns of wise conduct within the dynamic context of marital life; and
(2) The gap between prevailing psychological theories and the deeply value-oriented and ontological foundations necessary for attributing meaning to interpersonal interactions.
Drawing upon authoritative religious sources, this study seeks to bridge this gap. Its primary purpose is to identify and construct a coherent conceptual architecture of the fundamental components and underlying factors that facilitate wise interaction between spouses from the perspective of the Holy Qur’an, with emphasis on Tafsir al-Mizan. These components are explored not as isolated elements but as a dynamic and interconnected network. The central research questions revolve around identifying these underlying components and explicating the overarching conceptual architecture that governs their relationships and integrative mechanisms within a holistic framework.
Method: This study employed a qualitative approach using inductive qualitative content analysis to identify and interpret the underlying components of wise interaction between couples from the Qur’anic perspective. The data source consisted of Qur’anic verses accompanied by their corresponding commentaries in Tafsir al-Mizan. Sampling was conducted purposively using the criterion of maximum variation (in terms of surahs and thematic diversity), followed by screening based on direct relevance to the research questions and interpretive richness. Ultimately, 27 verses along with their full exegesis were selected as the final sample.
The unit of analysis was defined as each verse together with its relevant commentary in al-Mizan. Data analysis proceeded through four stages: open coding, focused coding, axial coding, and selective coding. This process began with approximately 150 initial codes and was progressively refined into four central themes (underlying components).
To ensure the validity of the extracted model, expert validation was conducted. A researcher designed questionnaire, including methodological details and extracted components supported by Qur’anic and exegetical evidence, was reviewed by nine experts in Qur’anic sciences, Islamic psychology, and family counseling. Their assessments, based on the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR), demonstrated strong agreement and statistical confirmation of the content validity and structural necessity of the four identified components, thereby establishing the conceptual reliability of the final model.
Findings: Qualitative analysis led to the identification of four key and interrelated components as the underlying factors enabling wise interaction between spouses from the perspective of the Qur’an and Tafsir al-Mizan:

Self-regulation: The foundational capability to manage emotions and impulses.
Self–relationship awareness: Deep understanding of oneself and one’s role within the relationship.
Economic security: Stability and rational management of livelihood and financial resources.
Future-oriented prudence: Joint planning and foresight for shared life goals.

These components are not conceptualized as direct interactional behaviors but rather as psychological-structural prerequisites that create the conditions necessary for informed and rational relational exchanges. They collectively form a coherent enabling architecture in which each component dynamically and reciprocally strengthens the others. For instance, self-regulation facilitates relational awareness; relational awareness enhances financial management; and financial stability supports future-oriented planning.
This dynamic network constitutes the essential foundation for the emergence of process-level elements of wise interaction—such as collaborative decision-making or constructive conflict management. In the absence of this foundational network, positive interactions are either unlikely to occur or will lack the stability and quality required for sustainable marital functioning.
Figure 1: Conceptual model of contextual components in the intelligent interaction of spouses.
Discussion and Conclusion: The findings of this study identify four components—self-regulation, self–relationship awareness, economic security, and future-oriented prudence—as an integrated architecture that underpins wise interaction between spouses from the perspective of the Qur’anic framework. When these results are compared with current knowledge in social and psychological sciences, there is a clear alignment at the functional level—such as emotion regulation and financial stress management—while notable differences emerge at the foundational level, highlighting the developmental progression of these components.
The Qur’anic-Tafsir perspective transcends the realm of merely skill-based competencies, endowing these components with deep semiotic, ethical, and ontological significance. Accordingly, self-regulation is elevated to a moral virtue, and future-oriented prudence is subsumed within the concept of responsible piety (takwa). This framework redefines marital relationships not just as psychological phenomena but as ethical-rational institutions, transforming the family into a domain where practical relational wisdom is practiced and cultivated.
Within this model, the identified components serve the realization of the relationship’s ultimate ideals—sakinah (tranquility), maddah (affection), and rahmah (mercy)—by acting as foundational precursors that enable the unfolding of virtuous and meaningful interactions. The study marks an initial but significant step in re-examining religious texts through an interdisciplinary lens, which has the potential to inspire future quantitative, comparative, and intervention-based research.
Overall, the proposed model demonstrates how simultaneous attention to the psychological-structural (context) and value-semantic (direction) dimensions can foster a sustainable and growth-promoting bond—one that responds to terrestrial needs while aspiring toward celestial ideals.
Acknowledgments: The author sincerely appreciates the valuable efforts of esteemed scholars who meticulously and patiently contributed to the qualitative evaluation of this research. Their insightful comments and constructive guidance played a pivotal role in enhancing the final quality of this article.
Conflict of Interest: The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Keywords


منابع
اسعدی، سمانه، امیری، شعله، مولوی، حسین، و باقری نوع‌پرست، خسرو (1392)، «معرفی مفهوم خردمندی در روان‌شناسی و کاربردهای آموزشی آن»، رویکردهای نوین آموزشی، س8، ش18، 1-28.
بیات، علی (1399)، تدوین مدل مفهومی خرد و فرایند خردورزی براساس منابع اسلامی، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، رشته روان‌شناسی، قم: مؤسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینیe.
بیات، علی، رفیعی هنر، حمید، و جهانگیرزاده، محمدرضا (1401)، «مفهوم‌شناسی خرد در روانشناسی و تناظرشناسی مفاهیم آن در منابع اسلامی»، مجله روانشناسی دین، ش3، 27-46.
چراغی، فرشته، کدیور، پروین، عسگری، علی، و فرزاد، ولی‌الله (1394)، «مفهوم خرد بر پایه دو رویکرد نظری متفاوت: یک همبستگی بنیادی»، فصلنامه تازههای علومشناختی، س17، ش3، 47-54.
طباطبایی، محمدحسین (1417ق)، المیزان فی تفسیر القرآن، قم: دفتر تبلیغات حوزه علمیه قم.
کردنوقابی، رسول و نبی‌زاده، صفدر (1396)، «تبیین خرد براساس هوش معنوی و جهت‌گیری مذهبی»، پژوهشهای روانشناختی، س20، ش1، 76-90.
کردنوقابی، رسول، دلفان بیراوند، آرزو، و عربلو، زینب (1394)، «دیدگاه سالمندان در مورد خرد و مؤلفه‌های آن: روان‌شناسی خرد»، مجله روانشناسی پیری، س1، ش3، 78-105.
محمدپور، احمد (1398)، ضد روش: زمینه‌های فلسفی و رویه‌های عملی در روش‌شناسی کیفی. چ2، قم: لوگوس.
محمدی ری‌شهری، محمد، و مسعودی، عبدالهادی (1387)، خردگرایی در قرآن و حدیث، ترجمه مهدی مهریزی، قم: دارالحدیث.
ملک‌محمدی، حسین، رحمانی شمس، حسن، حشمت، قاسم و فرامرزی راد، بهروز (1396)، «بررسی مفهوم خرد در بزرگسالان با استفاده از صفات شخصیتی»، مجله اصول بهداشت روانی، س19، ش3 (ویژه‌نامه سومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی نوآوری‌های اخیر در روان‌شناسی، مشاوره و علوم رفتاری)، 185-190.
موسوی، سید میثم (1397)، تدوین مدل مفهومی حکمت در منابع اسلامی و مقایسه آن با عقل در روان‌شناسی، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، روان‌شناسی مثبت‌گرا، قم: دانشگاه قرآن و حدیث.
References
Amato, P. (2012). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00873.x.
Ardelt, M. (1997).Wisdom and life satisfaction in old age. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52B(1), P15–P27. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/52B.1.P15.
Asadi, S., Amiri, Sh., Molavi, H., & Bagheri Noaparast, Kh. (2013). Introducing the concept of wisdom in psychology and its educational applications. Modern Educational Approaches, 8(18), 1-28. [In Persian] https://ensani.ir/fa/article/342324.
Bangen, K. J., Meeks, T. W., & Jeste, D. V. (2013). Defining and assessing wisdom: A review of the literature. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(12), 1254–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2013.06.005.
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Bayat, A. (2020). Developing a conceptual model of wisdom and the process of reasoning based on Islamic sources (Master’s thesis). Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. [In Persian]
Bayat, A., Rafiei Honar, H., & Jahangirzadeh, M. R. (2022). Conceptualization of wisdom in psychology and the correspondence of its concepts in Islamic sources. Journal of Psychology of Religion, (3), 27-46. [In Persian]. https://share.google/M91KpNMU1knoR005G.
Beck, A. T. (1988). Love is never enough: How couples can overcome misunderstandings, resolve conflicts, and solve relationship problems through cognitive therapy. Harper & Row.
Bloch, L., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034272
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.
Cheraghi, F., Kadivar, P., Asgari, A., & Farzad, V. (2015). The concept of wisdom based on two different theoretical approaches: A fundamental correlation. Journal of Cognitive Science News, 17(3), 47-54. [In Persian]. https://share.google/M91KpNMU1knoR005G.
Conger, R. D., Rueter, M. A., & Elder, G. H. (1999). Couple resilience to economic pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.54
Gilmore, A. (2014). A cultural examination of hardiness: Associations with self-esteem, wisdom, hope and coping efficacy (University Honors Program Theses). Paper 77.
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gottman, J. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically-based marital therapy. W. W. Norton & Company.
Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work. Crown Publishers.
Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00737.x
Greenberg, L. S. (2015). Emotion-focused therapy: Coaching clients to work through their feelings (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
Kardan Noghabi, R., Delafan Biravand, A., & Arablo, Z. (2015). The perspective of the elderly on wisdom and its components: Psychology of wisdom. Journal of Aging Psychology, 1(3), 78-105. [In Persian]. https://sid.ir/paper/259425/fa.
Kardan Noghabi, R., & Nabizadeh, S. (2017). Explaining wisdom based on spiritual intelligence and religious orientation. Psychological Research, 20(1), 76-90. [In Persian]. https://jour.aicti.ir/Article/32699/FullText.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.
Linden, M., Baumann, K., Lieberei, B., Lorenz, C., & Rotter, M. (2011). Treatment of posttraumatic embitterment disorder with cognitive behavior therapy based on wisdom psychology and hedonia strategies. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 80(4), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1159/000321580.
Malek Mohammadi, H., Rahmani Shams, H., Hesmat, G., & Faramarzi Rad, B. (2017). Investigating the concept of wisdom in adults using personality traits. In Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 19(3): Special Issue of the Third International Conference on Recent Innovations in Psychology, Counseling and Behavioral Sciences (pp.190-185). [In Persian]. doi: 10.22038/jfmh.2017.8536.
McCullough, M. E., & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014213.
Mohammadi Rey Shahri, M., & Masoudi, A. (2008). Rationalism in the Quran and Hadith (M. Mehrizi, Trans.). Dar al-Hadith. [In Persian]
Mohammadpour, A. (2019). Anti-method: Philosophical grounds and practical procedures in qualitative methodology (2nd ed.). Logos. [In Persian]
Mousavi, S. M. (2018). Developing a conceptual model of wisdom in Islamic sources and comparing it with reason in psychology (Master’s thesis). University of Quran and Hadith. [In Persian]
Schultz, K. S., Whitney, D. J., & Zickar, M. J. (2014). Measurement theory in action: Case studies and exercises (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Skerrett, K. (2016). We-ness and the cultivation of wisdom in couple therapy. Family Process, 55(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12195.
Staudinger, U. M., & Glück, J. (2011). Psychological wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131659.
Staudinger, U. M., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (1994). Manual for assessment of wisdom–related knowledge (Technical Report No. 46). Max Planck Institute for Human Development. https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/en/research/history-of-the-institute/archives.
Tabatabai, M. H. (1997). Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an. Qom: Dar al-Tabligh al-Islami. [In Persian]
Waller, M. R. (2019). Crisis planning in families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(4), 923-939. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12587.